Évariste de Parny was a poet of rare elegance. He lived during the 18th century, a time of change and revolution in France. His poetry combined sensitivity, exotic influence, and classical form. He is best known for his romantic poems, often inspired by personal love stories. He brought new depth to French lyric poetry. His verses appealed to both aristocrats and revolutionaries.
This article will explore his life, his major works, his style, and his influence. It will also compare him with other poets of the 18th century. These include André Chénier and Jacques Delille. Together, they shaped the poetic landscape of pre-revolutionary and revolutionary France.
Early Life and Background
Évariste Désiré de Forges, vicomte de Parny, was born on February 6, 1753. He was born on the Isle of Bourbon, now called Réunion. This island is located in the Indian Ocean. It was a French colony at the time. His family belonged to the minor nobility. His father was a colonial official.
Growing up on the island, young Parny experienced tropical nature. This exotic setting influenced his imagination. Many of his poems contain references to palm trees, ocean breezes, and distant lands. His birthplace gave him a unique voice among French poets.
In 1763, he was sent to France for his education. He studied in Rennes and Paris. He also trained for the military. However, his heart was not in soldiering. He preferred poetry, literature, and philosophy.
Early Poetry and Love Themes
Parny began writing poetry in his early twenties. He was influenced by classical poets like Horace and Virgil. He also read modern poets, including Jean-Baptiste Rousseau. But his own experiences became his deepest inspiration.
His first major work, Les Poésies Érotiques, was published in 1778. It was a collection of lyrical poems. They were inspired by a woman named Esther Lelièvre. She was a Creole girl he loved in his youth. The love was not fulfilled. She married another man. Parny turned his sorrow into verse.
The poems in this book were simple yet refined. They used classical forms but expressed personal feeling. Parny’s tone was soft and melancholic. He did not use dramatic language. Instead, he used subtle images and gentle rhythms.
Comparison with André Chénier
André Chénier was another poet of this period. He also combined classical form with personal emotion. But his tone was different. Chénier was more fiery and political. He used poetry as a tool of revolution. He believed in liberty and justice.
Parny, by contrast, focused on inner feeling. He avoided political topics in his early work. His concern was personal love and memory. This gave his poems a timeless quality. They seemed to float above history.
Maturity and Literary Recognition
After the success of Les Poésies Érotiques, Parny became well-known in literary circles. He joined the salons of Paris. He made friends with other writers and thinkers. Among them were Bernardin de Saint-Pierre and Nicolas Chamfort.
In 1787, he published another important work: Le Portefeuille Volé (The Stolen Wallet). This was a collection of poetic fables, tales, and epigrams. In it, Parny explored more varied themes. He used wit, irony, and satire.
This book showed his range as a poet. He could write with elegance and also with humor. He was not only a poet of love but also of observation. He described human nature in short, sharp verses.
Influence of Classical Poets
Parny admired ancient poets. He translated and imitated many of them. He believed in clarity, balance, and harmony. These were the values of classical art. He followed the models of Latin poetry. But he added personal feeling. This mix gave his work a special flavor.
Revolutionary Period and Satirical Verse
The French Revolution began in 1789. It changed the social and political world. Many poets responded to it with patriotic poems. Parny took a different path.
In 1799, he published La Guerre des Dieux (The War of the Gods). This was a bold and satirical poem. It mocked religion and politics. It used the form of an epic poem. But it was filled with irony. The gods of Olympus fought among themselves. They reflected the foolishness of men.
This work shocked many readers. It was seen as irreverent and daring. But it also won praise for its wit and courage. Napoleon Bonaparte is said to have admired it. Parny took risks in this poem. He used humor to make serious points.
Comparison with Jacques Delille
Jacques Delille was another poet of the time. He was more conservative than Parny. He wrote long descriptive poems about nature. His style was rich and detailed. He avoided controversy.
Parny, on the other hand, embraced bold satire. He mocked hypocrisy and superstition. His poems were shorter and sharper. He had the courage to provoke. This made him more modern in tone.
Later Years and Decline
In his later years, Parny held public posts. He was a member of the Institut de France. He also served in Napoleon’s imperial court. But he wrote less poetry during this time. His health declined, and his creative energy faded.
He died in Paris on December 5, 1814. By then, his fame had dimmed. New Romantic poets were emerging. They had a different style and spirit.
Literary Style and Innovations
Parny’s style was simple and clear. He avoided complex metaphors. He liked smooth rhythms and elegant lines. His language was pure and restrained.
He helped develop a new kind of lyric poetry. It was more personal and emotional. It did not rely on myth or grand themes. Instead, it focused on inner life.
He also helped prepare the way for Romanticism. Poets like Lamartine and Hugo admired him. They saw in him a voice of feeling and sincerity. He was a bridge between Classicism and Romanticism.
Use of Exotic Settings
Parny often used tropical scenes in his poems. He described islands, palm trees, and warm seas. These images came from his youth in Réunion. They gave his poems a dreamy and distant quality.
This use of exotic imagery was new in French poetry. It made him stand out. It also influenced later poets, like Charles Baudelaire. Baudelaire admired the mix of beauty and melancholy in Parny’s work.
Critical Reception Over Time
Parny’s reputation has changed over the years. In the 18th century, he was praised for his elegance. Voltaire is said to have liked his poems. The public loved his love verses.
In the 19th century, critics saw him as a forerunner of Romanticism. Sainte-Beuve wrote about him with respect. Later poets recognized his originality.
In the 20th century, his fame declined. His simple style seemed old-fashioned. But scholars have returned to him. They see his work as important in the history of French poetry.
Legacy
Parny’s legacy lies in his tone. He created a voice that was calm, tender, and ironic. He did not shout or preach. He spoke softly, but with depth. His influence can be seen in poets like Marceline Desbordes-Valmore and Paul Verlaine.
He also inspired poets outside France. Russian poets like Pushkin admired him. Pushkin called him one of his “masters.” This shows the wide reach of Parny’s work.
Comparison with Other Poets of the Era
To better understand Parny, we can compare him with several poets of his time:
1. André Chénier
As noted before, Chénier was more political. He died young during the Revolution. His poetry was noble and tragic. Parny was more personal and ironic.
2. Jacques Delille
Delille focused on nature and harmony. He was a master of long poems. Parny wrote shorter and more emotional pieces. Delille represented the end of Classicism. Parny pointed toward Romanticism.
3. Nicolas Gilbert
Gilbert was another poet of feeling. He wrote about suffering and injustice. But his tone was bitter. Parny was more balanced. His sadness was soft, not angry.
4. Antoine Bertin
Bertin was a friend of Parny. He also came from Réunion. His poems were similar in mood. But Parny was the greater talent. He had more variety and control.
Conclusion
Évariste de Parny was a unique voice in 18th-century French poetry. He combined classical form with personal emotion. He used exotic images and gentle rhythms. He wrote about love, loss, and human folly. His poems were simple but deep.
He influenced later poets in France and abroad. He stood between Classicism and Romanticism. He was not as dramatic as Chénier, nor as grand as Delille. But he was more modern in his tone.
Today, we can read Parny’s poems and still feel their charm. They remind us that poetry does not need to be loud to be powerful. A quiet voice, well-crafted, can last through the ages.
Related topics:
17th Century German Poet: Georg Rudolf Weckherlin